princesslori princesslori

18-09-2016
History

contestada

Why must historians always be skeptical when they read primary sources documents?

Respuesta :

shadowfall shadowfall

18-09-2016

Because they could be biased and strongly opinionated and also the primary source does not have the benefit of hindsight and is therefore not a valid interpretation and less credible

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Question b keeps telling me I’m wrong

The informal communication network, called the grapevine, doesn't follow authority lines and is established by social affiliation of members of an organization

which point of view is this in?

what is the product of( w + x)( w + x) cause w2+2×w+×2 is not the right answer

Hi! It's me again.I still need help about speaking. As soon as possible.If you have got time and reading this.Pls tell me the tips and important things t

In Oedipus the King, Part 1, what causes the quarrel between Creon and Oedipus

All people who spoke Navajo could translate the codes used in WWII? A) True B) False

find the height of the tree to the nearest foot.

Every angle in the polygon is a right angle. The area of the polygon is 426 in2What is the length of the left side of the polygon? Show your workPlss help

What does this word mean in English? politono a. ringtone b. directory c. to text d. telephone number